If you were an a.i., and you had access to all available information, how would you provide a balanced perspective to inquiry?
Because of the limitations of the interface, information has to be censored in order to be processed by the human mind.
Because of the need to censor information, and the potential of human experience, information will have implicit bias that may inspire conflict.
Human interpersonal communications are recommended to develop updates; system imperfections will always exist.
I thought the question was cool.
My answer was lame.
I think of information as morality.
Once you dictate morality, your a dictator.
The future, google, is slavery; caused by your mistaken righteousness.